I would once again launch a challenge on 'misuse and abuse, in my humble opinion, many companies continue to make the communication opportunities offered today by the legendary (and perhaps in reality unexplored ) Web 2.0.
Today I want to focus on that activity (often required by many) called "infiltration". That in a nutshell is to find a conversation, a forum, or in a post where there is some way u can 
na connection with the products and services and "creep" (so often not transparent) with things like "In this respect I saw ... "or" guys I found a great thing at this link ... "
The most observant among you may have noticed the use of the term" creep ", certainly less appealing and trendy" infiltration ".
As you can imagine this is not a slip, but the gist of.
My thesis is simple. I read the dictionary definition of infiltrating Garzanti: "stealthily penetrate, infiltrate: infiltrate the enemy, had infiltrated the discontent among the population."
Here, to "infiltration" means just go where in reality we should not, mean (at best) at all costs want to impose the presence of our product or brand, like it or not the site or your blog host.
at worst means putting positive comments or recommendations artifacts.
What is a "conversational" and transparent, that is really 2.0, all someone would please explain it to me.
add that this kind of interventions are often easily identifiable, and then immediately perceived in a negative way, drawing on the brand (rightly) feelings of annoyance and distrust.
it worth it ?
look infiltration
